Trial on Citizenship Scandal Delayed Again: Witness Absence Cited

Trial on Citizenship Scandal Delayed Again: Witness Absence Cited

The hearing linked to Al Jazeera's documentary on Cyprus’s naturalization program faces another postponement, with new court dates set for January 27 and 29.

The opening hearing in the trial related to Cyprus's controversial naturalization program, highlighted in an Al Jazeera documentary, faced a delay as key witnesses could not be presented. The court approved the Prosecution Authority’s request for a brief postponement, scheduling the next sessions for January 27 and 29 at 9:30 AM.

Presiding Judge Nikolas Georgiadis expressed significant concerns about the procedural developments. He noted that the court had previously denied a similar postponement request from the Prosecution Authority. This earlier request was related to witnesses and charges 4 and 5 of the case.

The prosecution’s representative, Haris Karaolidou, explained that despite extensive efforts, logistical challenges prevented the key witnesses from attending. As a result, the Prosecution Authority cited its inability to begin the trial properly, and since the defense raised no objections, the court approved a short delay.

Efforts to Secure Witnesses

During the brief recess, Karaolidou stated that several attempts were made to ensure witnesses were available. While another police officer was present and prepared, they were unable to testify as they had handled specific case-related evidence. Another witness was contacted but had not yet confirmed their availability, while a third officer traveled from Larnaca but had not yet arrived.

In light of these complications, Karaolidou emphasized the importance of starting the case appropriately:

“To serve the public interest and the court’s time, as well as to protect the defendants' rights, I submitted this request for a short postponement to avoid commencing the process in an irregular manner.”

Judge Georgiadis stressed the need for proper summonses to ensure witness attendance. He highlighted that the court’s decision to approve postponements is a matter of discretion and should not be taken for granted:

“It was incorrect to assume that because the defense raised no objections, the court would automatically approve the request. Postponements are an exceptional measure.”

He added that while the court operates under a heavy caseload, ensuring swift trials remains a judicial obligation and a right of the defendants.

The court approved the postponement, setting the next hearings for January 27 and 29 at 9:30 AM.

Loader